edubun
English

Statements and truth values

“Close the door” can be obeyed or ignored, but it cannot be true or false. “The door is closed” can, and that one sentence of difference is where logic starts.

Sentences that can be true or false

Logic studies arguments: a list of sentences called premises, followed by a sentence called the conclusion that is supposed to follow from them. Not every sentence can sit in one of those places. A question such as “Is it raining?” asks for information. A command such as “Bring an umbrella” tells someone what to do. A cry such as “Ouch!” expresses pain. None of these says that something is the case, so none of them can be correct or mistaken in the way a claim can.

Compare “It is raining in Busan right now.” That sentence makes a claim about the world, and the world decides whether the claim is right. The open textbook forall x defines a sentence, in the logical sense, as a sentence that can be true or false. In maths classes and many textbooks the same thing is called a statement or a proposition. Being true or being false is called the truth value of the statement, so every statement has exactly one of two truth values.

Questions (?) and commands or cries (!) have no truth value. Only a sentence that claims something gets a T (true) or an F (false).

A statement does not need to be one whose truth we know. “The number of grains of sand on Haeundae Beach is even” is a statement: it is either true or false, even though nobody will ever count. “There is life on a planet of another star” is also a statement. Logic cares whether a sentence has a truth value, and leaves the job of finding out which value it has to science, history or plain checking.

Opinions, vague words and open sentences

Here two traditions part ways. forall x warns readers not to confuse the idea of a sentence that can be true or false with the difference between fact and opinion: “Kimchi stew is the best food” still counts as a sentence that can serve as a premise. School maths in Korea is stricter. Its textbooks call something a proposition only when anyone can clearly decide whether it is true, so value judgements such as “best food” or “a beautiful song” are left out. In this course we follow the logic textbook, but on a school test you should follow the stricter rule.

Vague words cause a related problem. “Minho is tall” has no fixed truth value until we agree what counts as tall. A sentence with a variable, such as “x + 2 = 5”, is true when x is 3 and false otherwise, so on its own it is not yet a statement. Korean textbooks call such a sentence a condition. Pronouns behave the same way: “She was born in 2009” becomes a statement only once we know who she is.

Negation: turning a statement around

For any statement p, its negation, written ¬p and read “not p”, is true exactly when p is false. The negation of “The shop is open” is “The shop is not open.” That much is easy. The trap is with words like all and some. The negation of “All the buses are late” is not “All the buses are not late.” It is “Not all the buses are late”, which means at least one bus is on time. To check a negation, ask whether exactly one of the pair must be true in every situation. If both could be false together, you have written an opposite, not a negation.

Statements like “The shop is open” are called simple or atomic. Words such as and, or, not and if ... then join simple statements into compound ones, and the truth value of a compound statement depends only on the truth values of its parts. The next units work through those connecting words one at a time.

BackgroundThe line between sentences that are true or false and sentences that are not is old. In On Interpretation, Aristotle wrote that every sentence has meaning, “yet every sentence is not a proposition; only such are propositions as have in them either truth or falsity. Thus a prayer is a sentence, but is neither true nor false.” He set prayers and similar sentences aside for the study of rhetoric and poetry, and logic has kept that division for more than two thousand years.
statement (proposition)A sentence that is either true or false
truth valueTrue (T) or false (F)
negation ¬pTrue exactly when p is false
open sentenceA sentence with a variable, like x + 2 = 5; true or false only once x is fixed
atomic statementA statement with no connecting words inside
compound statementStatements joined by and, or, not, if ... then
  1. Which sentence is a statement?
    • Is the library open?
    • Please open the window.
    • The library opens at 9.
  2. “Wow, what a goal!” is
    • a true statement
    • a false statement
    • not a statement
  3. “The number of hairs on your head right now is odd.” Is it a statement?
    • Yes, it is true or false even if nobody knows which
    • No, because nobody can count it
  4. “x + 4 = 10” on its own is
    • a true statement
    • a false statement
    • not yet a statement (an open sentence)
  5. What is the negation of “All the tickets are sold”?
    • All the tickets are unsold.
    • Not all the tickets are sold.
    • Some tickets are sold.
  6. What is the negation of “Some students passed”?
    • Some students failed.
    • No student passed.
    • All students passed.
  7. If p is true, then ¬p is true.
    • True
    • False
  8. ¬¬p (not not p) always has the same truth value as p.
    • True
    • False
  9. Under the Korean school-maths definition, which is NOT a proposition?
    • 7 is a prime number.
    • Seoul is in Japan.
    • Autumn is the loveliest season.
  10. “He won the race” becomes a statement when
    • we know who “he” is and which race
    • we add an exclamation mark
    • it is written in the past tense
  11. Which pair are negations of each other?
    • It is hot. / It is cold.
    • The door is locked. / The door is not locked.
    • Everyone came. / No one came.
Key points
  • A statement is a sentence that is true or false.
  • Questions, commands and cries have no truth value.
  • You do not need to know the truth value for a sentence to have one.
  • ¬p is true exactly when p is false; check negations of “all” and “some” carefully.
Sources for this course (9)
  • P. D. Magnus, Tim Button, Aaron Thomas-Bolduc, Richard Zach, forall x: Calgary , chapters 1 to 6 on sentences, arguments, validity, soundness, connectives and truth tables (forallx.openlogicproject.org/html/)
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Robin Smith, "Aristotle's Logic" (plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-logic/)
  • definition of deduction from Prior Analytics I.2 24b18-20, the three figures and the medieval names Barbara and Celarent
  • Aristotle, On Interpretation 17a, E. M. Edghill translation (classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/interpretation.1.1.html)
  • "a prayer is a sentence, but is neither true nor false"
  • Irving H. Anellis, "Peirce's Truth-functional Analysis and the Origin of Truth Tables" (arxiv.org/abs/1108.2429): Peirce manuscript of 1893, Shosky's 1997 find on a 1912 Russell typescript
  • Emil Post, "Introduction to a general theory of elementary propositions", American Journal of Mathematics 43 (1921)
  • Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1921, English 1922)
  • 4.31. Everyday example sentences are made up for teaching.

Checked: 2026-10-17